Sunday, March 11, 2007

Tougher Lending Standards May Increase Housing Problems

From Gannett:

Since the start of the year, more lenders have been shutting their doors to people like Booker, just as those homeowners' interest rates are rising. They're slashing the "Bad credit? No problem" types of loan programs, known as subprime, that helped fuel the housing boom. And they're raising the bar for homeowners and first-time buyers to qualify for new loans.

The trend accelerated last week after federal regulators proposed stricter guidelines for banks that make subprime ARMs (adjustable-rate mortgages). The move followed Freddie Mac's decision to drastically raise the criteria for the subprime ARMs it would buy and to require better proof of a borrower's finances.

The industry is reacting to the waves of subprime borrowers who've defaulted on their ARMs in recent months. The tighter controls should help prevent future borrowers from getting in over their heads and protect them from predatory lenders. But the sudden shift in lending rules could also threaten the homeownership gains made by families since 2000, weaken the recovery of the housing market and potentially slow the economy.


As lenders tighten their standards higher risk borrowers who want to refinance their respective loans are facing problems. This will probably make the current housing market problem of high inventory a whole lot worse.

13 comments:

Eric said...

It seems shortsighted for analysts to claim that this is a bad thing. Too many low or financially insecure have been lured into the realm of home ownership by deceptively low rates and the "American dream" McMansion with a SUV for every adult and cell phone for every child.

It's just not realistic.

A rising tide may life all boats.... but if half of them are not seaworthy then you are going to end up with a hell of a mess on your hands.

Anonymous said...

Has anybody seen a movie called "The Money Masters", if so what is your opinion on it?

If you have not here is a link

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8753934454816686947&q=The+Money+Masters&hl=en

I would appreciate a response

Thank You

redfish said...

looks like NEW is finished, every warehouse line got pulled and they can't meet obligations

Eric said...

"The Money Masters" = Conspiracy Tripe

After 2 minutes with only 1 factual statement I turned it off.

Anonymous said...

Please inform me of what the conspiracy that would be and what was not factual about it.

Thank you

Eric said...

Anonymous... do your own homework

There are plenty of problems with monetary policy these days, but attempting to blame the Fed Reserve for brokering some sort of national "secret" takeover is crazy talk.

Anonymous said...

Here one comment about the movie mabye you might believe what he had to say.

"As you know, I am entirely sympathetic with the objectives of your Monetary Reform Act...You deserve a great deal of credit for carrying through so thoroughly on your own conception…I am impressed by your persistence and attention to detail in your successive revisions... Best wishes. Milton Friedman," Nobel Laureate in Economics; Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace

Here is a link for more reviews

http://www.themoneymasters.com/reviews.htm

So again please inform me of what the conspiracy that would be and what was not factual about it.

Thank you

Anonymous said...

Here one comment about the movie mabye you might believe what he had to say.

"As you know, I am entirely sympathetic with the objectives of your Monetary Reform Act...You deserve a great deal of credit for carrying through so thoroughly on your own conception…I am impressed by your persistence and attention to detail in your successive revisions... Best wishes. Milton Friedman," Nobel Laureate in Economics; Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace

Here is a link for more reviews

http://www.themoneymasters.com/reviews.htm

So again please inform me of what the conspiracy that would be and what was not factual about it.

Thank you

Eric said...

"I suspect the entire set of quotes consists of endorsements from fellow conspiracy theorists accompanied by fabricated quotes from individuals the authors think sound impressive. The purported quote from Milton Friedman is particularly in need of verification, since it is so incredibly unlikely. Are we really supposed to believe Milton Friedman supports legislation[1] that would effectively eliminate all banks in the U.S.? — Mateo SA (talk | contribs) 05:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)"

Wikipedia

Anonymous said...

First thank you for your response, since nobody else (ex.Bonddad) is willing to weigh in on the issue. But if your truly care about economics than you should try to educate your self on all facets not just some.

Why draft model reform legislation with little to no chance of enactment under the present circumstances? Nobel Laureate in Economics, Milton Friedman, offers two reasons:


Milton Friedman

...it is worth discussing radical changes, not in the expectation that they will be adopted promptly but for two other reasons. One is to construct an ideal goal, so that incremental changes can be judged by whether they move the institutional structure toward or away from that ideal.

Friedman continues:

The other reason is very different. It is so that if a crisis requiring or facilitating radical change does arise, alternatives will be available that have been carefully developed and fully explored. (End quote)


Money is just a means to trade with, but when you give the power to print that money and to control how much or how little. Also allowing a private entity to put a tax on top of your trading means then you have given them the ability to control the economy in every means, simply printing more money or less allows them to create booms or market falls or as you would probably say just the cost of doing business. When the system is rigged there can only be one winner, the ones that rigged it originally.

We would still have a banking system, that is not what is being proposed. Yes I would agree that is radical and would lead to chaos, but that is not what the film is about. What is being proposed is that we got back to a system that we had under President Lincoln.

As you told me---do your own homework---

Watch the film and then make your opinion on it, learn both sides of the argument, not just the one you currently know.

Again please inform me of what the conspiracy that would be and what was not factual about it?

Thank you

Eric said...

Nutjob...

I will not watch the film since I already know all I need to about it's content.

Anonymous said...

What a brilliant post you just made, considering your still not able to inform me what that conspiracy would be and what was not factual about the film. Please do tell, since you’re so educated.

You say do your homework, please back up the statements you made about it being conspirator and fact less, unless you have no facts to stand by. That is why you lash out like a three your old and start name calling Brilliant!

By the way that is what our founding fathers of this country fought for, so that must make them "nutjob" as well then. Also don't forget about one of the most world renowned economists (Milton Friedman) of the modern period. Hmm.

But you know better, Interesting!!

That’s fine, I guess you just rather be ignorant. Nice talking to you though, unless you have any facts to stand by I guess I’m done talking to you, Good day.

Thank you

Eric said...

Still hiding behind that anonomity... you must be profiting from the DVD sales.... Right?

Anyone willing to put this quote up on their site is a nutjob...

'"The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole...Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies, and republics the power to create the world's money..."

- Prof. Carroll Quigley, renowned, late Georgetown macro-historian (mentioned by former President Clinton in his first nomination acceptance speech), author of Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time'"

and anyone stupid enough to believe the theory that this DVD is putting forward has been blinded by their own misfortunes in life to see that fact.

That is the last I will say on this subject