Here is a chart from the St. Louis Federal Reserve's FRED system. The blue line is the civilian force and the red line is the total number of employed according to the establishment survey. Notice the blue line has remained fairly constant for the last few months while the red line has increased. That means the low unemployment rate is partly explained by simple math rather than a really strong employment situation. That does not mean the employment situation is incredibly bad. I would guess that if you took out the skewing of the numbers you'd wind up with an unemployment rate around 5% (
this is a guestimate, nothing more). However, the picture isn't as rosy as implied by the numbers either.
2 comments:
How many of those represent people holding multiple jobs?
Note that this is headcount unemployment ... but if 200 people who wish full time work are employed 3/4 time, that is the same amount of unemployed labor as 150 people employed full time and 50 full unemployed ... while the headcount employment would count an unemployment rate of 0% out of the first 200 and 25% out of the second 200.
If there is 3% underemployment ... in these quantity terms rather than in quality term ... not an unreasonable estimate ... and the headcount unemployment rate ought to actually be 5% unemployment, then in terms of the economy of 1960, that is effectively 8% unemployment.
This lines up with the close to stagnant median real wages over the current recovery.
Post a Comment