I've had some questions in the comments about certain technical analysis "things". So, I'm going to do a bulk answer. In addition, I wanted to mention why I use certain technical analysis methods and not others.
-- Technical analysis without fundamental analysis is crap. The old maxim goes something like this: "fundamental analysis tells you what to buy while technical analysis tells you when to buy." I don't care how good a chart reader someone is. If they can't tell me a fundamental reason why they like or don't like something I'm not listening.
-- I'm not a big fan of about 90% of the technical analysis (TA) indicators like stochastics, relative strength indicator and the like. There is a huge lie that goes around which basically assumes TA can somehow create a fool-proof system of trading. "If the chart says this, and the indicator says that then do this." Sorry, that doesn't work at all. The main problem I have with most indicators is they aren't foolproof and usually aren't the best indicator of what will happen.
-- That being said, there are about 5 indicators I do like.
-- Most indicates that use volume: On Balance Volume and the Chaiken Money Flow are good at telling you when money is flowing into and out of a security.
-- Simple Moving Average (SMA): This is a great way to see what certain trends are. I use the 10, 20, 50 and 200 day. Because there are 5 days in a trading week, this gives us the 2 week, 1 month, 2 and a half month and and 40 week trend line. This is essentially a range of trends from pretty short to fairly long.
-- The Exponential Moving Average: This simply gives more weight to more recent days trading. It assumes that what happened more recently is more important that what happened less recently.
-- The MACD: I fall in and out of love with this indicator. I like it because it uses SMAs. I don't like it because it's easy to fall into the trap of "this always works." So I use it sometimes and don't use it sometimes.
The main thing I always look for is the trend. That's about all I look for. Where are prices going, and will they continue in that direction? That's really about it; there's nothing incredibly fancy about it.
Now, onto trend lines.
How do I determine the trend line? I wish I had a great rule of thumb, or some great scientific way that I could pass on. What I do is look at the chart and see where the lows and highs connect, or if they connect. That's about it. Some charts give this information easily and some don't give any clue. That's the nature of the beast. It's always possible to disagree about charts because one person sees one thing and someone else sees something else. That's one of the reasons I love to read other TA blogs - to see what they see because I could miss something along the way.
Finally, a note about Bonddad' trading.
Most of my money is conservatively invested. Right now it's mostly in inflation-indexed bonds, utilities and consumer staples. I keep most of my money conservatively invested because I want to retire at some time. I set aside a small amount of "play" money to trade options. I never mention any of the securities I trade because I am not a licensed broker. And despite the disclaimer at the top right of this blog I want to protect myself legally (I am a lawyer, after all).
SP 500 and NDX Futures Daily Charts - Weak Rally Tuesday
16 minutes ago


2 comments:
Thanks for explaining some of your methods!
Ditto thanks for the TA primer. It's not my style of looking at the market -- to me the charts seem like ancient soothsayers trying to divine the future by looking at the entrails of a chicken they sacrificed. And the focus on predicting what's to come based on the ebb and flow of what's been happening has elements of a driver trying to navigate forward by looking in the rear-view mirror to analyse the road surface he just passed over. "Hmmm, that last stretch was rutted corduroy dirt, which explains why my fillings were rattling when I went faster than 50 kph. Now there's a bit of moisture in the tread marks which indicates a mud puddle coming up, so I had better turn left..."
That said, it's always interesting to learn how different people look at the world, especially when it comes to something as important as money. I'll never be one to glom the implication of a double bottom in the SPYs, unless it's on a curvy secret agent like Valerie Plame. But it's good to be exposed to the idea that that style of analysis is out there. And I do appreciate the compendium of links and summaries of financial news you provide.
Keep up the good work, and in regards to your New Year's message about upcoming Big Events, never forget that real life is more important than spending time in front of the 'puter blogging, if a choice has to be made...
Post a Comment