Monday, May 2, 2011

The Great Depression, Part 1

Nothing seems to get people more interested in arguing about economics than talking about the Great Depression. To some people it was the greatest economic success of the last 100 years, while others argue it was the beginning of the massive welfare state which has destroyed civilization as we know it.

Regardless of your political orientation, there is one common thread to both sides of the discussion about the Great Depression: a remarkable and perhaps understandable focus on the politics of the time rather than the pure economic data. So this week all I'm going to look at is data to explain what happened.



Let's start with GDP, which the above chart shows in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. Notice the "V" shape. The economy contracted from the years 1929-1933 but then expanded from 1933 onward with the exception of a dip in 1938. Also note that by 1939, real GDP was at a decent rate above the 1929 level. This chart tells us there was plenty of actual economic growth during the Great Depression.


One of the common arguments made against the idea of government spending is that an increase in government spending will crowd out private spending. However, the above chart shows that did not happen. While private investment did contract from 1929-1932, we saw a slight uptick in 1933 followed by strong advances in the years 1934-1937. In 1938 there was a drop down but levels started to rise again in 1939. This chart demonstrates that private investment rebounded fairly quickly during the Great Depression.


The above chart shows government spending as a percentage of GDP. Notice that the highest level this reached during the Great Depression was 22.4% in 1932. These levels are commensurate with those that exist today.

The point of the above charts is to illustrate that the entire decade was not one of complete disaster; for the latter half of the decade the economy grew quite well. Next, we'll look at other macro-statistics.

2 comments:

Dragonchild said...

What scares me to no end is the irrational, stubborn and destructive human quality to insist on being "right".

The stakes here are the economy. As I always maintain, the economy exists to further prosperity; you do not sacrifice prosperity for the economy unless you're completely insane. Even farther down the koo-koo scale is the willingness to sacrifice the economy for ideology.

This site isn't perfect, but it approaches the economy in exactly the right way. If something worked, we know it worked and we have the data to prove it worked. . . goddammit, let's go with what worked. It's a win-win situation. The ONLY reason right-wingers have left to insist the New Deal didn't work is because it's offensive to them. They just don't like it. They're willing to throw the economy back into recession just to be "right" (which is basically just getting their way and blaming its failures on others)?

Look, the way I see it, what I want out of the economy is an opporunity to earn my keep. My interest in the economy is, it's the best source of such an opportunity -- when healthy, anyway. I don't care what we call the system -- capitalism, communism, socialism, lassez-faire, spread option, pick-and-roll -- hell, let's call it "Republicans are the best economists EVAR" program as a bargaining chip to get them to stay out of politics if it's all about ego to them. I just want the economy to function properly, and an adaptive hybrid system based on functional finance seems to work best. The only dog I have in this fight is trained to bite the craziest members of the pack.

paper cup making machine said...

awesome story...........