The following two graphs are from Mike Konzcal over at the Next New Deal (see links here and here) and they highlight a terrifying trend in the US:
First, notice that the amount of money spent on public education has been declining since the recession. Second,
We are also seeing a large decline in the number of teachers who are actually teaching.
So, we're seeing a sharp decrease in educational spending at the national level, while the teachers who have been fired are not being replaced by the private market. That means we'll be seeing things like increased class size -- a terrible idea for educating children -- increased stress on teachers and in general a very bad situation overall.
I can speak to this from the experience of my state, Texas. We have a biennial legislative session that lasts a few months. In the last session, the state cut $5.4 billion from the education budget. While the educational system was very vocal about this this, it passed through the legislature because it's extremely conservative. In the latest budget proposals, we're seeing a projected surplus but there has been no talk about making up the deficit in financing even though the population of the state has increased since then. The following summation is from the El Paso Times:
Texas lawmakers -- primarily Republicans -- two
years ago passed a $173.5 billion budget that cut spending and services
and did not fully fund inflation or population growth. The budget sliced
$5.4 billion from public education and put off nearly $5 billion in
Medicaid costs. Only one member of El Paso's delegation in Austin,
then-Republican state Rep. Dee Margo, voted for the budget two years
ago.
The proposed 2014-15 House budget uses about $187.7
billion in state and federal funds, which is $2.2 billion less than the
current budget. The Senate version is about $186.8 billion, or $3.1
billion less than the current budget.
But while the proposed budgets would use $2.2
billion to pay for the projected enrollment growth of 85,000 students in
the state in 2014-15, neither would include money for the enrollment
growth that was not fully funded in the last budget cycle. The proposed
budgets also do not restore the $5.4 billion in budget cuts to public
education that the Legislature approved last session.
We're seeing the same problem at the national level with infrastructure spending. As I've noted ad nauseum, the US' infrastructure is in terrible shape and needs a massive amount of investment to bring it up to speed. Yet, we continue to implement stop gap measures that only put a band-aid over the problem.
The basic problem is that investment in education and infrastructure is neither politically sexy nor are the benefits immediately apparent. However, by not making these investments now, we are shooting ourselves in the foot regarding long-term economic growth.
Kansas City Fed: Regional Manufacturing expanded in May
32 minutes ago




3 comments:
What also needs to be factored in is the decrease in property valuations that also impacted education funding as that is the primary source. Locally here in Virginia they have raised property taxes but mainly as your chart shows, to keep things flat. Bob McDonnell yesterday actually included salary bumps that haven't been given in a number of years.
The delivery of education is in need of evolution. http://goo.gl/ksdQ0
I am in favor of any measure that reduces support for the outdated legacy model.
Spending is declining yet administration growth has exploded. Cuts shouldn't fall to teachers but instead administration perhaps. Another example of inefficient spending of taxpayer dollars IMO. Where are the true priorities in our school system? Bloated salaries and power at the top? Or student education? Growth of administration compared to teacher-student growth suggests the former.
http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/01/chart-of-the-day-public-schools-bloated-with-bureaucracy/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FmmMP+%28CARPE+DIEM%29
Post a Comment